Financial DD. Commercial DD. Legal. ESG. Operational. An LBO model with sensitivity tables. An audit report verifying every number. An IC-ready investment memorandum. For a deal you sourced this morning.
Upload your CIM. Get the output. No setup. No training.
Every number cited to source document and page. Every claim verified. Every gap flagged.
Traditional diligence burns 4-6 weeks of exclusivity. You're left with days to negotiate. ADKA compresses diligence into hours, not weeks.
| Traditional Diligence | With ADKA | |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first IC memo | 4–6 weeks | 4–6 hours |
| Documents reviewed | ~60% (what the team got to) | 100% — every page, every footnote |
| Red flags surfaced | 1–2 (what someone noticed) | 5–7 (systematically detected) |
| Team required | 3–4 analysts full-time | 1 analyst reviewing output |
| External advisor fees | $150K–$450K (QoE, legal, commercial) | $0 — included |
Inside the 40% your team didn't read:
ADKA reads 100%. Every page. Every footnote. Every schedule.
No human team can do this. Every ADKA run does.
What your Investment Committee hears before and after ADKA.
"We believe EBITDA is approximately $42M based on management projections."
"Revenue growth appears strong at ~25–30%."
"The LBO model shows attractive returns."
"Legal review didn't flag any major issues."
"Normalized EBITDA is $38.2M, per the QoE report (p. 14). Management's $52M figure includes $13.8M in non-recurring adjustments we have excluded."
"Revenue grew 28% YoY: FY24 $142M, FY23 $111M — per audited financials, pp. 23–24."
"At 10x entry, 5-year hold, 12x exit: IRR 22.4%, MOIC 2.8x. Sensitivity: 18.1%–26.7% IRR across 8x–14x exit multiples. Break-even at 7.2x."
"Legal DD identified 3 material risks. All manageable with deal structuring per attached remediation plan."
Before your IC memo reaches your desk, four audits run automatically. This is the difference between "the AI said so" and "here is the proof."
Every financial ratio recomputed. EBITDA margin. Leverage. IRR. DSO. If a number doesn't add up, it's flagged before it reaches your IC.
EBITDA appears in 5 places across your deal docs. Is it the same number in all 5? If not, which one is right? We find out. Flagged: $38.2M vs. $38.7M — period boundary mismatch.
Your fund's mandate says max 6x leverage. This deal models at 5.8x. Within bounds. This check runs on every deal, automatically — before it reaches the committee.
"ARR grew 28% YoY" — says which document, which page? Every claim is traced to source. Claims without evidence are flagged. You decide, with full visibility.
| Annual cost — middle-market PE firm | Without ADKA | With ADKA |
|---|---|---|
| QoE provider | $80K–150K | $0 — included |
| Commercial DD consultant | $60K–100K | $0 — included |
| Legal DD (external counsel) | $40K–80K | $0 — included |
| Junior analyst (fully loaded) | $180K–250K | Redeployed to higher-value work |
| ADKA subscription | — | $102K/yr |
| Total hard cost | $360K–580K/yr | $102K/yr |
Plus: 3x deal throughput at zero marginal diligence cost.
ChatGPT gives you an answer. ADKA gives you the answer, the source document, the page number, a math audit verifying the numbers, a compliance check against your fund's mandate, and an evidence gap report showing what couldn't be verified. When your IC asks "where did this number come from?", one answer gets you promoted. The other gets you in trouble.
Your data is isolated per tenant. Nothing is used to train models. You control retention. SOC 2 Type II audited. We treat CIMs the way you treat CIMs — as the most sensitive documents in your firm.
We target 95%+ on structured financial metrics. For numbers below that confidence threshold, we flag them for human review rather than publishing them. We'd rather say "unverified — review required" than "wrong."
Upload your CIM. Get your first pack in under 6 hours. No training. No configuration. No IT involvement. If you can drag and drop a PDF, you can use ADKA.
Yes. The system adapts to your industry focus, deal size range, and mandate parameters. A SaaS deal gets ARR/NRR/churn/deferred revenue analysis. A manufacturing deal gets inventory turns/plant utilization/capex analysis. Different questions for different businesses — automatically.
No. ADKA produces the outputs your existing process expects — diligence reports, LBO models, IC memos — just faster and with better coverage. It slots into your workflow. It doesn't replace it.
Middle-market deals ($20M–$500M enterprise value) across SaaS, healthcare services, manufacturing, business services, and consumer. The system is optimized for sponsor-backed acquisitions with standard dataroom materials. Add-on and carve-out deals are supported with additional configuration.
Zero setup. Zero commitment. See what ADKA produces from your own deal documents.
PDF format. Encrypted in transit. Never used for training.
See a complete output pack from a sample SaaS deal. No upload needed.
Enter the 6-digit code sent to
These firms already have it on their desk.